PaperQuest

Systematic Review Basics

A systematic review starts with a reproducible protocol. Define inclusion criteria early, document exclusions, and report search strings for replicability.

Why this matters

Systematic reviews are trusted when the process is transparent and reproducible. Informal searching cannot provide the same confidence level.

Even for smaller assignments, systematic habits improve evidence coverage and reduce hidden bias in final conclusions.

What you'll learn

How to frame inclusion and exclusion criteria
How to document screening decisions and reasons
How to synthesize findings without overgeneralizing

Best practices

Write your protocol before you run major searches
Use multiple databases and record exact query strings
Track exclusions with short, defensible rationale notes

Common mistakes to avoid

Changing criteria after seeing results without disclosure
Dropping contradictory studies from synthesis sections
Reporting findings without method transparency

Next steps

Draft a simple protocol, run your first two database searches, and maintain a screening log alongside your bibliography file.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need PRISMA for class projects?

You can use a lightweight version. The key is transparent search and screening decisions.

How many databases should I include?

Two to four relevant databases is a practical baseline for most non-thesis projects.

Open PaperQuest tools